Get Permission Rekha, Gomasani, Kumar, and Prasanth: Effectiveness of oral health education on caregivers in improving oral health status among 3-6 years old school children in Nellore city – A randomized controlled trial


Introduction

Oral health is integral to overall well-being, particularly in early childhood, as this is a critical period for the development of oral health habits that can significantly impact a child's long-term dental well-being. Proper oral hygiene practices, dietary habits, and regular dental check-ups are essential components of maintaining optimal oral health during these formative years. Dental caries affects humans of all ages across the world and the complex multifactorial etiology associated with its initiation and progression makes it difficult to eradicate.1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), dental caries is still a major oral health problem, and about 60-90% of schoolchildren and the vast majority of adults are affected by dental caries. According to the national oral health survey, 89% of the 6- year-old children have had dental caries experience.2, 3, 4 Epidemiological research shows significant differences in the incidence of caries among preschool children, varying between 3% and 85%, and strongly linked to socioeconomic status and ethnicity.1 Worldwide, many early childhood caries (ECC) cases remain untreated due to limited dental care access. This can cause extensive tooth damage, chronic infections and inflammation, mouth pain, reduced appetite, disturbed sleep, and lowered school performance and confidence, all of which negatively impact children's quality of life, growth, and development.

A young child's dental environment is intricate because the mother's dental knowledge, attitudes, and practices significantly influence the child's oral health.Few studies have indicated that a mother's knowledge and attitudes regarding oral health significantly impact their children's tooth-brushing habits and dental health. The habits and conditions established during preschool years lay the groundwork for future oral health and the use of dental services into adulthood. It is crucial to help parents understand their role as models for their children and to encourage better dental health practices.5, 6 Therefore, equipping caregivers with the necessary knowledge and skills related to oral health promotion can have a significant impact on fostering good oral hygiene practices among preschool-aged children. As caregivers play a key role as transmitters of oral health behaviour for their children very few studies have been reported in India on oral health education of caregivers in schools and none so far in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh, India. So the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of oral health education on caregivers and oral health status of 3-6 year old school going children in Nellore. Therefore, hypothesis of the study is increasing mothers/caregivers knowledge about positive attitude toward desirable oral health behaviours regarding their children will lead to better oral health of the children.

Materials and Methods

The study was randomised trial conducted in 400 children aged 3-6 years in schools of Nellore city, Andhra Pradesh, India. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Narayana Dental College & Hospital (IEC/NDCH/2022/Mar/p-31 and CTRI -055250) and permission was obtained from school principals. Written informed consents were obtained from mothers and caregivers, and the study was explained to them. The sample size was calculated based on the prevalence 41.9% obtained from the previous study by Srikanth Koya et al1 with a precision of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% and the total sample size achieved was 376. By adding 10% drop out rate a total of 400 sample size is obtained.

The selection of study participants were done on basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children with age group 3 -6 years.

  2. Having consent and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Failure to complete three educational sessions

  2. Lack of desire for participation.

  3. Suffering from mental and emotional diseases. (Concerning their medical profiles).

A pilot study involved 25-30 children and caregivers, distributing a pre- validated questionnaire to caregivers and oral examination of children.Oral health education was given to caregivers and and after 30 days again the same questionnaire was given to caregivers and collected. The questionnaire's reliability was tested using a test-retest method, obtaining a 0.9 cronbach's alpha value.

Study procedure

The children and caregivers were divided randomly into two groups: Group I and Group II.

Clinical examination

On the predetermined dates for each school, all enrolled participants were asked to gather in their classrooms. The investigator assessed the children's oral health using a mouth mirror and explorer by using Simplified Oral Hygiene Index modified by Miglani (OHIS-M)7 was recorded. Caregivers knowledge on their Children's oral health was assessed through questionnaire which was pre-tested, self-structured, closed ended in their local language. By using CRA-RT 11 item closed ended questionnaire8 and REALD-309 questionnaire childrens caries risk and oral health literacy of caregivers were assessed respectively.

At baseline and 3rd month, health education were given to caregivers in the school premises with the help of school authorities.

Intervention (Oral Health Education)

Group I: The mode of delivery of oral health education was verbal along with pamphlets were used. Pamphlets contained colourful pictures alongside the text and explained in the regional language. The oral health education encompassed topics like the importance of teeth, type of dentition, brushing techniques and the importance of brushing, dental caries its etiology, treatment, preventive methods, the role of fluorides and rules for having a healthy mouth.

Group II: This group received a comprehensive program similar to group I, The mode of delivery of oral health education, along with verbal and pamplets, audiovisual aids were used. The video was 6 minutes and 10 seconds long. The video was also explained in the regional language.

During 6th month, evaluation was done by recording OHIS-M index in children. By using the same CRA-RT and REALD-30 children's caries risk and caregivers oral health literacy were assessed.

Statistical analysis

The data present in both pre and post intervention test was used for statistical analysis by using SPSS version 21.0.Basic descriptive statistics, paired and unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test were used.

Results

A total of 400 school-aged children between 3 and 6 years old, along with their caregivers who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were included in the study. Group 1and Group 2 consisted of 200 participants each. In Group 1, 10 participants were lost to follow-up due to not completing the questionnaries and interventions sessions and in Group 2, 14 participants were lost for the same reason. Consequently, 190 participants in Group 1 and 186 participants in Group 2 were analyzed.

Table 1 shows sociodemographic characteristics of participants. The most common age is 5 years, with boys being more common. Female caregivers dominate, with first-born children being the most frequent. Parental education is most common among mothers with college degrees, and fathers with bachelor's degrees.

Figure 2 showed that the study compares the OHI-S index given by miglani for primary teeth in two groups, showing significant decreases in mean scores at 6 months in both the groups

Table 2 presents the comparison of CRA-RT scores within and between groups at baseline and 6 months. The mean CRA-RT score was decreased from 36.8±4.28 to 24.3±5.64 in Group 1 and the mean score in Group 2 decreased from 37.2±3.58 to 16.26±3.76 from baseline to 6 months with a significant p value (p=0.000). The intergroup comparision showed a non significant difference at baseline (p=0.49) but at 6 months p value is significant (p=0.000).

Table 3 shows the comparison of REALD-30 scores within and between groups at baseline and 6 months. The mean score increased from 5.35 (SD=1.90) to 15.1(SD=2.23) in group 1 and in Group 2 it increases from 6.03 (SD=1.71) to 15.39 (SD=1.88) and there is statistically significant difference was seen among the two groups at baseline and at 6 months with p-values (p=0.000). Intergroup comparision showed a significant difference at baseline (p=0.001) but not at 6 months (p=0.216).

Figure 1

Clinical examination in children

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/114ddada-de33-452e-9f9a-e8cdd5671d0a/image/91147641-b0b2-4561-9871-5544b79f3549-uimage.png

Figure 2

Oral health education in caregivers

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/114ddada-de33-452e-9f9a-e8cdd5671d0a/image/44a1105a-1a78-45d0-bd02-d8fd80a7e4d9-uimage.png

Figure 3

Consort flow chart of the study

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/114ddada-de33-452e-9f9a-e8cdd5671d0a/image/1de15a18-34d0-4c32-9d9a-df5cef77b390-uimage.png

Figure 4

Intra and inter group comparison of OHIS-M at baseline and 6 months

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/114ddada-de33-452e-9f9a-e8cdd5671d0a/image/a30db9a9-ce44-4ab0-bca6-cd91d003980f-uimage.png

Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants

Demographics

Group 1

Group 2

Frequency (n)

Percent (%)

Frequency (n)

Percent (%)

Age of the child

4years

40

21.0

55

28.9

5years

81

42.6

98

51.6

6years

69

36.3

33

17.5

Gender of the child

Girls

87

45.8

83

44.6

Boys

103

54.2

103

55.4

Caregivers

Female

173

91.1

167

89.8

Males

17

8.9

19

10.2

Sequence of birth

1

103

54.2

122

65.6

2

85

44.7

62

33.3

3

2

1.1

2

1.1

4

0

0

0

0

Mother education

Below high school

16

8.4

5

2.7

High school

51

26.8

25

13.4

College degree

74

38.9

107

57.5

Bachelors degree

47

24.7

45

24.2

Masters degree

2

1.1

4

2.2

Father education

Below high school

3

1.6

2

1.1

High school

36

18.9

15

8.1

College degree

50

26.3

83

44.6

Bachelors Degree

75

39.5

73

39.2

Master degree

26

13.7

13

7.0

Table 2

Intra and Inter group comparison of CRA-RT scores

Baseline

6 months

Mean

Std. Deviation

Mean

Std. Deviation

Z value

P value

Group 1

36.8

4.23

24.3

5.64

-11.85

0.000*

Group 2

37.2

3.58

16.26

3.76

-11.833

0.000*

Uvalue

16958.0

90.500

pvalue

0.49(NS)

0.000*

[i] Mann Whitney u test p<0.05* significant

[ii] Wilcoxon signed rank test p<0.05* significant

Table 3

Intra and Inter group comparison of REALD -30

Baseline

6 months

Mean

Std. Deviation

Mean

Std. Deviation

Z value

P value

Group 1

5.35

1.90

15.1

2.23

-11.973

0.000*

Group 2

6.03

1.71

15.39

1.88

-11.851

0.000*

U value

760.0

16390.5

pvalue

0.001*

0.216 (NS)

[i] Mann Whitney u test p<0.05* significant

[ii] Wilcoxon signed rank test p<0.05* significant

Discussion

Caregivers play a vital role in improving children's oral health, especially through educational interventions that enhance oral hygiene practices. As oral health is crucial for overall well-being, particularly in early childhood, where good habits can ensure long-term dental health. Research consistently demonstrates that when caregivers, including parents and guardians, are well-educated about oral health, it has a positive effect on children's dental habits.10, 11 According to our study, the intervention showed significant positive changes in both Group 1 and Group 2. The demographic data revealed that most children were around five years old, predominantly boys, with most caregivers being females.

When caregivers are well-informed and motivated to maintain good oral hygiene, children are more likely to experience fewer dental problems, such as cavities and gum disease.Few studies also reported the positive impact of educational interventions for mothers and caregivers on improving children's oral health behaviors. For instance, a study by Naidu et al.12 indicated that children's oral health behaviors improved after parents and caregivers participated in educational intervention programs.

In this study,comprehensive educational interventions that include verbal instructions, pamphlets, and visual aids (Group 2) have proven to be more effective than those using only verbal instructions and pamphlets (Group 1).

The Oral Hygiene Index Simplified (OHI-S) by Miglani is a streamlined version of the Oral Hygiene Index (OHI) designed for easier and quicker assessment of dental cleanliness status of the primary dentition. The OHI-S simplifies the process by reducing the number of surfaces and teeth evaluated. The OHI-S by Miglani is widely used in both clinical practice and epidemiological studies due to its simplicity and efficiency in assessing oral hygiene.7

The study found that improved oral hygiene practices led to reduced debris and calculus. This aligns with Jackson et al. (2018)13 and Shirahmadi S et al.14 who also reported significant differences (P<0.001) in the OHI-S scores between control and intervention groups before and three months after the intervention.In the present study, the baseline oral health status using OHIS-M in the group 1 versus group 2, group 2 showed greater decrease mean value of 1.15.

Caries risk assessment tools, such as the Caries Risk Assessment (CRA), are essential for evaluating an individual's likelihood of developing dental caries. These tools guide decision-making and should be used before any treatment, ensuring effective allocation of resources.8, 15The present study showed that by utilizing caries risk assessment and referral tools leads to improved oral health outcomes this is in accordance with the study done by Featherstone et al.16 which demonstrated that targeted interventions based on CRA-RT resulted in reduced caries incidence and improved oral health behaviors in high-risk individuals.

In recent times, the estimation of adult literacy rates in India has gained significant attention, particularly due to its implications for public health. Literacy, defined as the ability to read and write, is foundational for health literacy, which is crucial for effective health management and disease prevention. Health literacy is the ability to obtain, comprehend, and use healthcare information to make informed health decisions. It serves as a non-pharmacological method for managing and preventing diseases, significantly enhancing the quality of health and healthcare.17

A specific aspect of health literacy is oral health literacy (OHL), which pertains to understanding and using information to maintain good oral health. Low OHL in the community can lead to difficulties in navigating dental care systems, increased emergency care utilization, inadequate use of preventive measures, and misunderstandings of self-care instructions. Poor OHL is linked to substandard oral health outcomes and health disparities.18, 19, 20 Efforts to enhance health literacy can lead to better individual and community health outcomes, reducing healthcare disparities and improving the overall quality of life. In this study, caregivers in Group 1 had a mean REALD-30 score of 15.1 (SD=2.23), while Group 2 had a score of 15.39 (SD=1.88), both showing significant improvements (p=0.000). These findings align with Prakash D et al,17 who reported a mean OHL score of 14.25 (SD=7.67) using the REALD-30 tool.Similarly, Jones et al.21 found a mean of 23.9 (SD=1.3) in a private dental office.

Moreover, the oral health literacy (OHL) of caregivers was found to be linked to the oral health status of their 3-6-years-old children. Lower health literacy levels tend to use more healthcare resources than those with better literacy skills. As the education level of mothers increased, their children's oral health status improved. This finding are in accordance with Rao A22 and Franciszek Szatko.23

There are several limitations to this study. Firstly, parents were asked to self-report when assessing their children's reading-based oral health literacy, and their pronunciation accuracy was not verified, potentially leading to errors. Additionally, the cultural influence on caregivers' perspectives was acknowledged. As our study is based on a self-administered questionnaire, it can be affected by participant recall and may also suffer from response bias due to 'social desirability,' where respondents misrepresent their behaviors by over-reporting socially acceptable actions and under-reporting undesirable ones. Aditionally potential bias from participants' desire to please healthcare providers by giving expected answers.

A key strength of this study was its assessment of child oral health status and practices. As the study was conducted in the school, the school environment is crucial for instilling healthy oral hygiene practices in young children. Since children are at a formative age, consistent exposure to oral health education in schools can effectively shape their lifelong habits. School-based programs can provide regular instruction and preventive care, ensuring that all children, regardless of their socio-economic background, have access to vital oral health information and resources.

Conclusion

In conclusion, educating caregivers on oral health can greatly enhance the dental health of preschoolers. The present study showed both groups had significant difference after intervention but group 2(verbal + pamphlet+ visual) showed somewhat more significance than group 1 (verbal + pamphlet). However, ongoing efforts are required to ensure the long-term effectiveness and expansion of these educational programs in mitigating oral health inequities among preschoolers.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

S Koya KS Ravichandra VA Arunkumar S Sahana HM Pushpalatha Prevalence of Early Childhood Caries in Children of West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, South India: An Epidemiological StudyInt J Clin Pediatr Dent2016932515

2 

R Soltani G Sharifirad B Mahaki AA Eslami The Effect of Oral Health Educational Intervention Program among Mothers of Children aged 1-6, Based on the Theory of Planned BehaviorJ Dent (Shiraz)20202142929

3 

PE Petersen The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health ProgrammeCommunity Dent Oral Epidemiol200331Suppl 1323

4 

S Bayat Movahed H Samadzadeh L Ziyarati N Memory R Khosravi PS Sadr-Eshkevari Oral health of Iranian children in 2004: a national pathfinder survey of dental caries and treatment needsEast Mediterr Health J20111732439

5 

A Ganesh MS Muthu A Mohan R Kirubakaran Prevalence of Early Childhood Caries in India - A Systematic ReviewIndian J Pediatr201986327686

6 

Y Wang MR Inglehart C Yuan Impact of Parents' Oral Health Literacy on Their Own and Their Children's Oral Health in Chinese PopulationFront Public Health202210809568

7 

DC Miglani JF Beal PM James SA Behari The assessment of dental cleanliness status of the primary dentition using a modification of the simplified oral hygiene index(OHIS-M)J Indian Dent Assoc197345123858

8 

SM Seetha V Thomas R Sivaram S Sreedharan BR Nayar Caries Risk Assessment and Referral Tool (CRA-RT)-A novel risk scoring system for early childhood caries in community settingsCommunity Dent Oral Epidemiol202048537986

9 

MC Junkes FC Fraiz F Sardenberg JY Lee SM Paiva M Ferreira Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the rapid estimate of adult literacy in dentistry–BREALD-30PLoS One2009107e0131600

10 

SZ Mohebbi JI Virtanen M Vahid-Golpayegani MM Vehkalahti A cluster randomised trial of effectiveness of educational intervention in primary health care on early childhood cariesCaries Res20094321108

11 

SVD Branden SVD Broucke R Leroy D Declerck K Bogaerts K Hoppenbrouwers Effect evaluation of an oral health promotion intervention in preschool childrenEur J Public Health20142468938

12 

R Naidu J Nunn JD Irwin The effect of motivational interviewing on oral healthcare knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: an exploratory cluster randomised controlled studyBMC Oral Health2015151015

13 

SL Jackson WF Vann JB Kotch BT Pahel JY Lee Impact of poor oral health on children's school attendance and performanceAm J Public Health2018981222218

14 

S Shirahmadi S Bashirian AR Soltanian A Karimi-Shahanjarini F Vahdatinia Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions of promoting oral health among elementary school studentsBMC Public Health2009241130

15 

SY Khan F Javed MH Ebadi RJ Schroth Prevalence and risk factors for ECC among preschool children from India along with the need of its own CRA tool-A systematic reviewJ Int Soc Prev Community Dent2022123295308

16 

JDB Featherstone S Domejean-Orliaguet L Jenson M Wolff DA Young Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adultJ Calif Dent Assoc200331213950

17 

D Prakash AK Murthy A Paul K Eremba G Gupta P Alex Oral Health Literacy among Caregivers in Bangalore City, IndiaInt Healthc Res J20193311622India

18 

AM D'Cruz MRS Aradhya Health literacy among Indian adults seeking dental careDent Res J (Isfahan)2013101204

19 

BD Weiss MZ Mays W Martz KM Castro DA DeWalt MP Pignone Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital signAnn Fam Med20053651422

20 

AM Horowitz DV Kleinman Oral health literacy: A pathway to reducing oral health disparities in MarylandJ Public Health Dent20127212630

21 

M Jones JY Lee RG Rozier Oral health literacy among adult patients seeking dental careJ Am Dent Assoc200713891199208

22 

A Rao SP Sequeria S Peter Prevalence of dental caries among school children of MoodbidriJ Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent1999171458

23 

F Szatko M Wierzbicka E Dybizbanska I Struzycka E Iwanicka-Frankowska Oral health of Polish three-year-olds and mothers’ oral health-related knowledgeCommunity Dent Health200421217580



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 08-08-2024

Accepted : 29-10-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijohd.2024.048


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 255

PDF Downloaded: 32