Get Permission Pratiwi, Soewondo, Chemiawan, Sam, Riyanti, and Setiawan: Relationship of complete unilateral and bilateral cleft palate with malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors


Introduction

Cleft lip and/or palate is a congenital anomaly of the facial structure characterised by a cleft lip and/or palate.1 Research conducted in the city of Bandung from 2011 to 2015 showed that the incidence of cleft lip and/or palate in Indonesia is quite high, with a total of 1,596 patients.2, 3, 4 A cleft lip and/or palate is multifactorial with both genetic and environmental factors playing a role.5, 6, 7 Patients with cleft lip and/or palate have a morphological shape that is different from that of normal children.8, 9 This anomaly can have a clinical impact on the quality of life of patients, as it can cause various problems, such as psychosocial aspects, communication and hearing problems.10

Primary and permanent teeth can be affected by cleft lip and/or palate, and teeth on the affected side of the cleft are often compromised.11 It has been found that 96.7% of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate patients have at least one dental deformity.12 Dental anomalies in the cleft area indicate that the cleft does not affect the dentition generally, but rather affects the dentition locally as in specific teeth only.13 The prevalence of dental anomalies depends on the severity of the cleft. Specific teeth are usually affected on the side of the possible cleft, including premolars, incisors or canines.14 The lateral incisors are the most commonly affected teeth in the dentition of patients with cleft lip and palate.12, 15, 16 Dental anomalies have comprehensive variations consisting of: number, size, shape, and eruption abnormalities and can cause difficulties in dental care and aesthetic problems.17, 18, 19 Dental anomalies can cause malocclusion and disturbances in tooth eruption and dental arch development.20, 21

Early diagnosis is important in preventing advanced maxillofacial deformities. Early diagnosis also allows for appropriate treatment planning and can reduce problems and the cost and difficulty of treatment. Panoramic radiographs produce images showing the maxillary and mandibular structures and supporting tissues that can be used to diagnose maxillofacial pathologies, make treatment plans, evaluate tooth development, and detect clinical symptoms of anomalies.22, 23 Early detection of asymptomatic situations with panoramic radiographs is particularly important in children because delayed treatment of long-term lesions and maxillofacial deformities can bring about several psychological problems.24, 25, 26 Early detection of dental anomalies is fundamental in terms of preventing several deviations that may occur in the permanent dentition.22, 24, 27

A new approach to craniofacial rehabilitation where paediatric dentists can assess facial and dental anomalies at the tooth seed stage using panoramic radiographs has been widely used and researched, but the assessment of malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors has never been done in Indonesia or at the YPPCBL Indonesian Cleft Centre RSGM Unpad Bandung. Assessment of malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors using panoramic radiographs is very useful for paediatric dentists in determining treatment plans for children with cleft lip and palate in Indonesia. The lack of data on dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate in Indonesia, and the relationship between these anomalies and the type of cleft, may hinder paediatric dentists in educating parents and developing comprehensive treatment plans to improve the quality of life of children with cleft lip and palate. With this background, the researcher conducted a study on the relationship between unilateral and bilateral complete non-syndromic cleft lip and palate with malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors at Yayasan Pembina Penderita Celah Bibir dan Langit-langit (YPPCBL).

Material and Methods

The object of this study uses primary data on clinical examination and secondary data in the form of data on paediatric patients aged 5-13 years obtained from the Yayasan Pembina Penderita Celah Bibir dan Langit -langit (YPPCBL) and panoramic x-ray data together with the results of interpretation signed by a dentist with expertise in radiology dentistry on paediatric patients with cleft lip and palate aged 5-13 years who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria between January 2019 and January 2022 at the Radiology Dentistry Installation of RSGM UNPAD. The sampling technique in this study was a total sampling technique, which means that the sample was taken as a whole that met the inclusion as follows:

  1. Digital panoramic radiographs and intraoral clinical photographs of girls and boys with unilateral or bilateral complete nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate aged 5-13 years who underwent primary surgery (labioplasty and palatoplasty) at the Indonesian Cleft Centre.

  2. Panoramic radiographs were taken between January 2019 and January 2022.

The exclusion criteria in this study were:

  1. Digital panoramic radiographs and intraoral clinical photographs of girls and boys with unilateral or bilateral complete nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate aged 5-13 years who underwent secondary surgery (palatal repair and bone grafting) at the Indonesian Cleft Centre.

  2. Poor quality digital panoramic radiographs: incomplete anatomical coverage, poor contrast and dentition, unclear anatomical structural details that cannot be used for diagnosis.

This research had obtained an ethical approval from the Ethical Committee of Padjadjaran University with reference number 388/UN6.KEP/EC/2022. The research was conducted at the Radiology Dentistry Installation of RSGM UNPAD from April to May 2022 and had obtained a research approval number 889/UN6.RSGM/TU.00/2022 and at the YPPCBL from March to May 2022 had obtained a research approval number 017/yppcbl/04/2022.

Materials and tools used in this research were results of digital panoramic radiographs together with interpretation by dentists with expertise in radiological dentistry, informed consent form to allow the taking of intraoral clinical examination photographs from the parents of the research subjects, diagnostic kit, intraoral glass, check retractor for clinical examination, 14" laptop computer, stationery for record keeping, form to collect data on malocclusion and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors.

Figure 1

Meterials and tools

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/92420006-30bc-4d7c-876c-38848e885bd0/image/f3f6dc5f-d8ea-4061-8c99-68024a982cd0-uimage.png

Figure 2

Complete unilateral and bilateral cleft palate

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/92420006-30bc-4d7c-876c-38848e885bd0/image/69e26428-587b-411e-ab81-e276b1eeb1aa-uimage.png

Figure 3

Impacted maxillary lateral incisors

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/92420006-30bc-4d7c-876c-38848e885bd0/image/af18d610-7729-45bf-a778-d77b95105680-uimage.png

Figure 4

Peg shape maxillary lateral incisors

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/92420006-30bc-4d7c-876c-38848e885bd0/image/7ab127fa-f60d-461f-87ff-4376feb6268e-uimage.png

Results

The data sample in this study was 35 samples, each consisting of secondary data from digital panoramic radiographs and primary data from clinical examinations obtained based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sample this study consisted of 18 male and 17 female patient panoramic radiographs accompanied by clinical examinations with an age range of 5-13 years. Complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra was the most common classification with a total of 14 samples at 40%, consisting of 6 male samples and 8 female samples. Complete bilateral cleft palate was the second most common condition with 11 samples representing 31.42%, consisting of 5 male and 6 female samples. Complete unilateral cleft palate dextral comes last with 10 samples at 28.57%, consisting of 7 male and 3 female samples. Sample characteristics based on gender, age and cleft type (Complete unilateral cleft palate dextra, complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra and complete bilateral cleft palate) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of samples according to gender, Age and cleft type

Gender

Age (year)

CUCPD

CUCPS

CBCP

Number of Sampels

%

Male

5

2

2

0

4

11,42

6

0

0

2

2

5,71

7

0

0

0

0

0

8

0

1

0

1

2,85

9

3

1

0

4

11,42

10

0

0

1

1

2,85

11

1

1

1

3

8,57

12

0

0

1

1

2,85

13

1

1

0

2

5,71

Female

5

2

3

1

6

17,14

6

0

0

1

1

2,85

7

0

2

0

2

55,71

8

0

0

0

0

0

9

0

3

2

5

14,28

10

0

0

1

1

2,85

11

0

0

0

0

0

12

0

0

1

1

2,85

13

1

0

0

1

2,85

Total %

10 28,57

14 40,00

11 31,42

35

100,00 100,00

[i] Notes: CUCPD= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Dextra, CUCPS= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Sinistra, CBCP= Complete Bilateral Cleft Palate

Table 2 shows the results of the interpretation analysis of malposition, malformation, agenesis and caries in the interpretation of panoramic radiographs and clinical examination. In this study, malposition of the maxillary lateral incisors was more common (41.43%) than malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors (18.57%). The most common malposition of maxillary lateral incisors was impaction in the type of complete unilateral cleft palatedextra in 15%, impaction of maxillary lateral incisors in complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra in 14.29%, and impaction of maxillary lateral incisors in complete bilateral cleft palate in 27.27%.

Rotation and ectopic eruption of the maxillary lateral incisors had the same percentage of 10% in this study and were more common in complete unilateral cleft palate compared to complete bilateral cleft palate. The least common malposition of the maxillary lateral incisors in this study was transposition, with a percentage of only 2.86%.

The most common maxillary lateral incisors malformation was peg shape in the complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra at 21.43%. The second most common maxillary lateral incisors malformation in this study was microdonsia which was found in complete unilateral cleft palate dextra at 10%, microdonsia of maxillary lateral incisors in complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra was found at 7.14% and 4.55% was found in complete bilateral cleft palate. The least common maxillary lateral incisors malformation found in this study was dens invaginatus which was only 1.43%.

The agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisors in the complete bilateral cleft palate had the highest rate of 59.09%, while the agenesis rate in the complete unilateral cleft palate dextra was almost the same at 25%, and the agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisors in the complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra was 21.43%. The caries affected maxillary lateral incisors in complete unilateral cleft palate dextra had the highest rate of 45%, followed by complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra with 25% and complete bilateral cleft palate with 18.18%.

Table 2

Characteristics of samples with malposition, malformation, agenesis, and caries based on panoramic interpretation and clinical examination

Variable

CUCPD (%)

CUCPS (%)

CBCP (%)

Total (%)

Malposition

45,00

39,29

40,91

41,43

Rotasi

10,00

10,71

9,09

10,00

Transposisi

5,00

3,57

0,00

2,86

Impaksi

15,00

14,29

27,27

18,57

Erupsi Ektopik

15,00

10,71

4,55

10,00

Malformation

10,00

32,14

9,09

18,57

Peg Shape

0,00

21,43

4,55

10,00

Mikrodonsia

10,00

7,14

4,55

7,14

Dens Invaginatus

0,00

3,57

0,00

1,43

Agenesis

25,00

21,43

59,09

34,29

Caries

45,00

25,00

18,18

28,57

[i] Notes: CUCPD= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Dextra, CUCPS= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Sinistra. CBCP= Complete Bilateral Cleft Palate

Dental anomalies found in complete unilateral cleft palate dextra were 50% in the maxillary dextra lateral incisors and 20% in the maxillary sinistra lateral incisors. Dental anomalies found in complete unilateral cleft palate sinistra were 17.85% in the maxillary dextra lateral incisors and 50% in the maxillary sinistra lateral incisors, whereas in complete bilateral cleft palate there were balanced results, namely 45.45% in the maxillary dextra lateral incisors and 50% in the maxillary sinistra lateral incisors.

Table 3

Characteristics of samples based on the cleft type and percentage of anomalies in the maxillary lateral incisors on the dextra and sinistra sides

Cleft Type

Number of sampels

Number of teeth

I2 Dextra

%

I2 Sinistra

%

CUCPD

10

20

10

50,00

4

20,00

CUCPS

14

28

5

17,85

14

50,00

CBCP

11

22

10

45,45

11

50,00

[i] Note: CUCPD= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Dextra, CUCPS= Complete Unilateral Cleft Palate Sinistra, CBCP= Complete Bilateral Cleft Palate

The relationship or association between the category of cleft palate with malposition and malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors was analysed using Non-parametric statistics in the form of Kendall's Concordant Rank Correlation (W) analysis can be seen in Table 4. The variables among malpositions and malformations that affect the cleft and how the relationship between malpositions and malformations variables are analysed by calculating the magnitude of the Spearman Rank correlation coefficient can be seen in Table 5.

Table 4

Relationship between cleft and malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors (Kendall Coefficient of Concordance)

Variable

Avg. Rank

Sum of Ranks

Cleft

2,90

203,00

Malposition

1,67

117,00

Malformation

1,43

100,00

Total

2,00

420,00

The relationship between unilateral and bilateral complete cleft palate with malposition and malformation of maxillary lateral incisors was analysed by calculating the magnitude of Kendall's Concordance correlation coefficient, which is 78.5% (W x 100%) which is statistically significant where the p-value = 1.38E - 24 = 0.000.00138 < 0.05. The variables among malposition and malformation that affect the cleft and how the relationship between malposition and malformation variables are analysed by calculating the magnitude of the Rank Spearman correlation coefficient can be seen in Table 5.

Seen in Table 4, Table 5, the results of the test of significance of the partial correlation coefficient, where the correlation between the cleft with malposition and the cleft with malformation shows the type of test that is not statistically significant (not meaningful) although the relationship exists but can be said to be meaningless (considered equal to zero), while between the variable malposition and malformation shows a statistically significant relationship with a strong relationship of 5.90% (rs2 x 100%)

Table 5

Relationship between cleft and malposition and relationship between cleft and malformation (Spearman rank)

Variable

rs

t

p value

Characteristics

Correlation

Cleft dan malposition

-0,03

-0,24

0,4058

Sign

0,08

Cleft dan malformation

-0,02

-0,14

0,4445

Non-Sign

0,03

Malposition dan Malformation

0,24

2,07

0,0213

Sign

5,90

Discussion

Early detection of dental anomalies in paediatric patients with cleft lip and palate is fundamental to the prevention of various irregularities that may include such as tooth sensitivity, malocclusion, impaired tooth eruption, impaired dental arch development and aesthetic problems.17, 24, 28, 29 Many recent studies have examined cleft palate in relation to dental anomalies, but the assessment of maxillary lateral incisor malposition and malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors has never been done in Indonesia YPPCBL Indonesian Cleft Centre RSGM Unpad, Bandung. Selection of the age range of the subjects of this study, which is 5-13 years old, the age selection is based on the estimated age of children who are in the period of the transition from primary teeth to permanent teeth.

The subjects of this study were panoramic radiographs of children aged 5-13 years taken for diagnostic purposes. Panoramic radiographs of children aged 5-13 years taken for diagnostic purposes. Secondary data in the form of panoramic radiographs was used as the object of study as this type of radiograph is an appropriate source of information to evaluation. Panoramic radiography is a radiation-enhanced image used in the clinical setting, are non-invasive and provide data that cannot be obtained by clinical examination.24, 30 Panoramic radiography is effectively used used in the imaging of oral and maxillofacial pathology, treatment planning, evaluation of dental development and detection of clinical abnormalities.31, 32 Secondary data is derived from the results of the use of digital panoramic radiography, which offer several advantages and convenience. The process of making digital panoramic radiographs is much faster, more environmentally friendly because it uses fewer chemicals, and the results can be modified and contrast corrected, reducing the possibility of retakes and minimising the risk of errors in interpretation and analysis.31, 32

The most common presentation of maxillary lateral incisor malposition in the in this study was impaction in both unilateral and bilateral complete cleft palate with an average of 18.57%. Impacted tooth is resulting from the cessation of tooth eruption due to a clinical abnormality or a radiographically detectable physical obstruction in the path of eruption or due to abnormal tooth position. Movement of the primary dentition during eruption leads to disruption of the position of these teeth in the dental arch, or to their impaction. Unilateral palatal clefts show collapse of the cleft side in the upper jaw resulting in a narrow dental arch.17, 33, 34, 35 A narrowed cleft palate and lack of space can also allow improper eruption. Secondary bone grafting should be performed to enhance the eruption lateral incisors and canines; therefore, lack of proper treatment may be the reason for impaction of the upper lateral incisors. Patients with impacted teeth require surgery and multidisciplinary orthodontic treatment to align the teeth with the dental arch.36, 37, 38

Maxillary lateral incisor rotation and ectopic eruption on the palatal side had the same percentage of 10% in this study. Tooth rotation is defined as the displacement of mesiolingual or distolingual teeth around their longitudinal axis. A study conducted by Liuk et al in 2013 showed that the maxillary lateral incisors had a greater mesiolabial rotation of 11,7°.17, 39, 40, 41, 42 The normal morphology of the maxillary lateral incisor is used as a guide to determine the presence of rotation radiographically. The maxillary lateral incisor does not rotate if the incisal edge of the crown is straight and parallel to the occlusal plane, it has obstacles in this study because the sample in this study has a high carries rate, making it difficult to study. Palatal eruption of maxillary lateral incisors in this study had a percentage that is not much different from impaction, this is in accordance with research conducted by Agnieszka Lasota and Tarac M, Cirakoglu N which states that the common tooth malposition in cleft lip and palate is the eruption of the palatal eruption of the lateral incisor.17, 24, 43, 44

The most common type of malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors found in this study is the peg shape, with an average percentage of 10%, which is consistent with the research conducted by da Cas NV, Machado RA, Coletta R, Della and Rangel in the journal Patterns of dental anomalies in patients with Patterns of dental anomalies in patients with nonsyndromic oral clefts. Common malformations in cleft lip and palate are peg-shaped lateral incisors maxilla.18, 45

Unilateral and bilateral total cleft palates are associated with malposition and malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors. This was mentioned by Hovorakova that during normal development, the medial fascial processus of the nasal and maxillary fuse to form the maxillary arch. The seeds of the incisors lateral maxillary primary incisor develop and has a double seed in the fusion area of the medial nasal and maxillary. If proper fusion of the periphery of the medial nasal and maxilla is followed by a lack of fusion of the dental epithelium in the superficial region of the face, lateral incisor anomalies may occur in normal jaws. Incomplete fusion of the medial nasal and maxillary areas results in maxillary clefts and abnormal incisors, which are often seen in patients with cleft palate. A physiological delay in the fusion of the dental epithelium and multiple seeds of the upper lateral may explain the developmental susceptibility to the occurrence of lateral incisor anomalies even in the absence of lateral incisor anomalies even in the absence of orofacial clefts.18, 45 Results this study shows that the presence of a gap increases the association between malposition and malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors. The most common malposition in this study was impaction of the lateral incisors, while the most common malformation in cleft palate is a peg shape of the maxillary lateral incisors.17, 18, 24

Conclusions

  1. Impaction is the most common maxillary lateral incisor malposition most commonly found in unilateral or complete bilateral cleft palate, followed by rotational and complete bilateral cleft palate, followed by rotation and ectopic eruption and the least common is transposition.

  2. Peg shape is the most common malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors, which is most commonly found in cleft palate, then microdonsia and the least common is dens invaginatus.

  3. There is an association between unilateral and bilateral complete cleft palate with maxillary lateral incisor malposition with a weak association, so that the association is not significant.

  4. There is an association between unilateral and bilateral complete cleft palate with maxillary lateral incisor malposition with a weak association, so that the association is not significant.

  5. There is an association of complete unilateral and bilateral cleft palate with malposition and malformation of the maxillary lateral incisors.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

1 

HY Al Bahesh HFA Munjjim Facial Deformity: Cleft Lip and Palate A RecapitulationSaudi J Oral Dent Res2020562816

2 

U Elfiah Kushariyadi SS Wahyudi Analisis Kejadian Sumbing Bibir dan Langit: Studi Deskriptif Berdasarkan Tinjauan GeografisJ Rekonstruksi dan Estet20216134

3 

HN Yılmaz EÖ Özbilen T Üstün The prevalence of cleft lip and palate patients: A single-center experience for 17 yearsTurk J Orthod201932313944

4 

E Sjamsudin D Maifara Epidemiology and characteristics of cleft lip and palate and the influence of consanguinity and socioeconomic in West Java, Indonesia: a five-year restrospective studyInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg2017466910.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.251

5 

BD Abbott The etiology of cleft palate: A 50-year search for mechanistic and molecular understandingBirth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol201089426674

6 

MJ Dixon ML Marazita TH Beaty JC Murray Cleft lip and palate: Understanding genetic and environmental influencesNat Rev Genet201112316778

7 

AM Maskoen SL Nasroen PN Fauziah ESS Soemantri BA Gani Expression of transforming growth factor alpha BamHi and RsaI gene variants associated with non-syndromic cleft palate of indonesian subjects using polymerase chain reaction methodAsian J Pharm Clin Res20188443514

8 

MM Tolarova L Al-Kharafi M Tolar C Boyd DSc is a member of the following medical societieshttps://emedicine.medscape.com/article/995535-overview?form=fpfMedscape

9 

AR Normastura MDM Khairi Y Azizah A Nizam AR Samsuddin L Naing Speech Disorders in Operated Cleft Lip and Palate Children in Northeast MalaysiaMed J Malaysia2008631215

10 

A Octavia Perawatan Interseptif Dental Pasien Anak Penderita CleftInsisiva Dent J201631105

11 

JV Dyck MC Llano-Pérula G Willems A Verdonck Dental development in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic reviewForensic Sci Int20193006374

12 

MO Akcam S Evirgen O Uslu UT Memikoǧlu Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palateEur J Orthod201032220713

13 

NU Huda HB Shahzad M Noor Y Ishaq MA Anwar M Kashif Frequency of Different Dental Irregularities Associated With Cleft Lip and Palate in a Tertiary Care Dental HospitalCureus2021134e1445610.7759/cureus.14456

14 

AM Răducanu AC Didilescu IV Feraru MA Dumitrache TA Hănţoiu E Ionescu Considerations on morphological abnormalities of permanent teeth in children with cleft lip and palateRom J Morphol Embryol20155624537

15 

DG Garib JP Rosar R Sathler TO Ozawa Dual embryonic origin of maxillary lateral incisors: Clinical implications in patients with cleft lip and palateDent Press J Orthod20152051185

16 

LE Janes M Bazina SS Morcos A Ukaigwe M Valiathan R Jacobson The Relationship Between Dental Agenesis and Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Cleft Lip and PalateJ Craniofac Surg202132620125

17 

A Lasota Dental abnormalities in children with cleft lip with or without cleft palateJ Pre-Clin Clin Res20211941346

18 

NVD Cas RA Machado RD Coletta ALCA Rangel Patterns of dental anomalies in patients with nonsyndromic oral cleftBraz J Oral Sci202019e208729

19 

A Consolaro MCM Medeiros DAO Miranda IA DeOliveira Supernumerary teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate: The tooth germs do not separateDental Press J Orthod2021264e21ins4

20 

AC Allori JB Mulliken JG Meara S Shusterman JR Marcus Classification of Cleft Lip/Palate: Then and NowCleft Palate Craniofac J201754217588

21 

I Miletich PT Sharpe Normal and abnormal dental developmentHum Mol Genet20031216973

22 

NH Bilge S Yesiltepe KT Agirman F Caglayan OM Bilge Investigation of prevalence of dental anomalies by using digital panoramic radiographsFolia Morphol20187723238

23 

WEM Wardill Cleft PalateLancet20182265836478

24 

M Tarac N Cirakoglu Determination of the prevalence of dental anomalies by digital panoramic radiography analysisMed Sci2021104112832

25 

AA Austin CM Druschel MC Tyler PA Romitti II West PC Damiano Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: Is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes? Cleft PalateCleft Palate Craniofac J201047118

26 

S Berkowitz Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management2nd edSpringer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg20162259

27 

I Kjær New diagnostics of the dentition on panoramic radiographs-Focusing on the peripheral nervous system as an important aetiological factor behind dental anomaliesOrthod Waves2012711116

28 

P Pastuszak I Dunin-Wilczyńska A Lasota Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and PalateJ Clin Med20209123813

29 

M Hovorakova H Lesot M Peterka R Peterkova Early development of the human dentition revisitedJ Anat2018233213545

30 

LR Johan Maxillary Canine Ectopia and other Developmental Anomalies on Mixed Dentition Panoramic Radiographs at the Tygerberg Oral Health CentreSouth AfricaMaster of Science in Dentistry, University of Western Cape 2017

31 

IN Francisco Overview of care in cleft lip and palate for orthodontic treatment PortugalFaculty of Dental Medicine University of Porto2021

32 

W Awadh M Pegelow A Heliövaara DP Rice Taurodontism in the first permanent molars in Van der Woude syndrome compared to isolated cleft palateEur J Orthod20214312935

33 

Å Sivertsen AJ Wilcox R Skjærven HA Vindenes F Åbyholm E Harville Familial risk of oral clefts by morphological type and severity: Population based cohort study of first degree relativesBMJ200833676414324

34 

D Shaye CC Liu TT Tollefson Cleft Lip and Palate. An Evidence-Based ReviewFacial Plast Surg Clin North Am201523335772

35 

ML Worley KG Patel LA Kilpatrick Cleft Lip and PalateClin Perinatol201845466178

36 

T Marzouk IL Alves CL Wong L Delucia CM Mckinney C Pendleton Association between Dental Anomalies and Orofacial Clefts: A MetaanalysisJDR Clin Trans Res20216436881

37 

YR Vandersluis DM Fisher K Stevens BD Tompson W Lou S Suri Comparison of dental outcomes in patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who receive secondary alveolar bone grafting before or after emergence of the permanent maxillary canineAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2020157566879

38 

IM Ickow S Zinn JM Stacy B Martin JE Losee A D'Alesio Dens Invaginatus in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Case SeriesCleft Palate Craniofac J2021581114528

39 

RE Mcdonald DR Avery Dentistry for the children and adolescebtMosby ElsevierUnited States201115074

40 

TY Kobayashi MR Gomide CF Carrara CFC Carrara Timing and sequence of primary tooth eruption in children with cleft lip and palateJ Appl Oral Sci20101832204

41 

CL Moon NM King MW Hai Dental development of Chinese children with cleft lip and palateCleft Palate-Craniofacial J200845328996

42 

A Suzuki M Nakano K Yoshizaki A Yasunaga N Haruyama I Takahashi A longitudinal study of the presence of dental anomalies in the primary and permanent dentitions of cleft lip and/or palate patientsCleft Palate Craniofac J201754330920

43 

TS Tunis O Sarne I Hershkovitz T Finkelstein AM Pavlidi Y Shapira Dental anomalies’ characteristicsDiagnostics (Basel)20211171161

44 

G Keskin K Karaer ZU Gündoğar Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of mutations in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis candidate genes : Analysis of a Turkish cohortJ Orofac Orthop202283Suppl 16574

45 

TL Gibson BH Grayson CB Cutting PR Shetye Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Alveolus Treated With 94 GingivoperiosteoplastyCleft Palate Craniofac J2022598101723



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 25-09-2023

Accepted : 12-12-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.048


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 778

PDF Downloaded: 223