- Visibility 7 Views
- Downloads 3 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijohd.2024.028
-
CrossMark
Enhancing anterior maxillary esthetics: A case report
Introduction
Rehabilitation of esthetic zone with dental implants is a venerable challenge. Compared to traditional methods, implants offer distinct advantages. Implants allow for the creation of restorations that closely mimic natural teeth, enhancing both aesthetics and functionality.[1]
Previously, limited bone availability, especially in the anterior mandible, impeded implant placement. Today, prosthetic requirements primarily guide implant positioning, reflecting the evolving approach of implant dentistry in addressing esthetic concerns in the anterior zone.[2]
Advancements in dental implant therapy have led to consistent success rates, ensuring predictable treatment outcomes. These innovations represent a significant evolution in the field, characterized by improved techniques and materials. Patients can now confidently opt for implant treatment, knowing they can rely on dependable results. This progress underscores the growing trust in dental implants as a reliable solution for tooth replacement, marking a significant milestone in modern dentistry's quest for excellence.[3], [4]
The importance of anterior maxilla is amplified due to its prominent visibility. With a high lip line, the smile becomes more exposed, heightening the demand for esthetic perfection. Certain experts highlight the necessity of balancing the function and esthetics in this area. Achieving an ideal outcome here not only restores functionality but also significantly enhances the individual’s confidence and overall quality of life.[5], [6], [7], [8]
Developing and optimal emergence profile for implant supported prosthesis in esthetic zone necessitates employing bone regenerative materials, soft tissue augmentation and appropriate abutments. This case report underscores the ideal implant positioning in the maxillary esthetic region yielding enhanced structural integrity and prosthetic appearance that integrate with the natural dentition.
Case Report
A young male adult sought care at the department of prosthodontics reporting the loss of his upper front tooth nearly 10 years ago following trauma. Detailed intraoral examination confirmed the absence of teeth in the 21 region ([Figure 1]).
The patient demonstrated good overall periodontal health, despite irregular professional oral hygiene visits. After discussing various treatment options, both parties agreed on implant placement in the missing area. Following thorough treatment planning, a 4.2 × 13 mm endo-osseous implant (AlphaBio tapered self-threaded regular platform spiral) was chosen. Following this, a supracrestal incision was given in the region and full thickness flap was raised which was followed by sequential preparation of osteotomy for placement of implant. After an appropriate radiological assessment, a spiral implant was placed with a primary stability of 35 N, cover screw was placed and primary closure of the flap was done. The patient was provided with antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions, along with postoperative instructions. At the one-week follow-up appointment, no adverse signs or symptoms were observed. ([Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4])
At 16 weeks post-implant placement, the healing abutment was installed ([Figure 5]), and two weeks later, the patient returned for impression making for tooth 21 and preparation of tooth 11. Tooth 11 was prepared, and an implant-level open tray impression was taken for tooth 21 using polyvinyl siloxane elastomeric impression material ([Figure 6]) and the healing abutment was placed back.
The final restoration was then installed at 20 weeks post-implant placement, involving cleaning of the abutment and trial fitting of the final crown followed by cementation of the prosthesis. The patient expressed satisfaction with both the aesthetic and functional outcomes and received oral hygiene instructions. A recall appointment was scheduled in three months for a routine check-up ([Figure 7], [Figure 8]).
Discussion
This report highlights the importance of meticulous planning and precise execution in achieving esthetic perfection in maxillary anterior region. [9] Opting for dental implants in this region offers significant benefits, with fixed implant-supported prosthetics showcasing multiple advantages over conventional crown and bridge or removable tooth-supported options. [10]
Among the treatment options considered were removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures, and resin-bonded bridges, each with drawbacks. Removable dentures risked bone loss and dissatisfaction, fixed options posed threats to adjacent teeth, and resin-bonded bridges had a higher failure rate. Consequently, implant placement emerged as the most advantageous solution. Adhering to correct prosthetic principles aimed to enhance implant-supported restoration success. Thus, implant placement offered superior functional and aesthetic outcomes while preserving adjacent dentition integrity. [11], [12], [13], [14]
Conclusion
Placing dental implants in the maxillary anterior region demands meticulous planning, precise surgery, and expert prosthetic treatment. This study outlines steps for optimal aesthetics, emphasizing comprehensive treatment planning and collaborative efforts between surgeons and dentists. Achieving desired aesthetics relies on careful prosthetic design. The report underscores the importance of a holistic approach to treatment in the anterior maxillary region.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- AS El Askary. Esthetic considerations in anterior single-tooth replacement. Implant Dent 1999. [Google Scholar]
- HP Spielman. Influence of the implant position on the aesthetics of the restoration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996. [Google Scholar]
- JD Bashutski, HL Wang. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- P Simeone, CD Paoli, G Leofreddi, S Sgrò, S Leofreddi, G Sgrò. Interdisciplinary treatment planning for single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- A Funato, MA Salama, T Ishikawa, DA Garber, H Salama. Timing, positioning, and sequential staging in esthetic implant therapy: a four-dimensional perspective. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- DA Garber. The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Oral Implantol . 1996;22(1):45-50. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- S Kamalakidis, G Paniz, KH Kang, H Hirayama. Nonsurgical management of soft tissue deficiencies for anterior single implant-supported restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- A Sadan, MB Blatz, TJ Salinas, MS Block. Single-implant restorations: a contemporary approach for achieving a predictable outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004. [Google Scholar]
- CE Misch. The importance of dental implants. Gen Dent 2001. [Google Scholar]
- M Tischler. Dental implants in the esthetic zone. Considerations for form and function. N Y State Dent J 2004. [Google Scholar]
- KC Kopp, AH Koslow, OS Abdo. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003. [Google Scholar]
- DK Zlatarić, A Celebic´, M Valentić-Peruzović. The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth. J Periodontol 2002. [Google Scholar]
- RP Frank, P Milgrom, BG Leroux, NR Hawkins. Treatment outcomes with Mandibular removable partial dentures: A population based study of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1998. [Google Scholar]
- TL Berekally, RJ Smales. A retrospective clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges inserted at the Adelaide Dental Hospital. Aust Dent J 1993. [Google Scholar]